12/11/20

Spy in the Slushpile #6: Apple Valley Review

    

Spy in the Slushpile #6 Apple Valley Review

Psssst! Over here! 
Notebooking Daily snuck agents into the offices of your favorite literary magazines to bring you—the potential submitter—the sweet low down, the inside track, the full two scoops of raisins. Everything you need to know to make as successful of a submission as possible will be here, but remember that the number one rule to putting your best foot forward is to take the time to read the journal you're submitting to and FOLLOW THE SUBMISSION GUIDELINES. This is vital to show the editors that you respect their time and effort, and because some journals will reject submissions that don't extend the simple courtesy of following guidelines, without even reading it—and no one wants that.

Today we check in with our spy who was sent to the offices of the literary magazine Apple Valley Review.

Our dossier: 
Apple Valley Review is an online literary journal.  It is published twice each year, once in spring and once in fall.  Each issue features a collection of beautifully crafted poetry, short fiction, and essays. They read emailed submissions year-round. They tell us "We prefer work that has both mainstream and literary appeal.  In other words, please send us work that is both accessible and finely written." And they have official hard sells before we even asked! Don't send them 1) true genre fiction (though literary pieces with genre elements are welcome); 2) work that is scholarly or critical, inspirational, or intended for children; 3)  erotica or work containing explicit language; or 4) anything that is particularly violent or disturbing.  


I poached the following helpful bits of information from various places on their website: 
The Apple Valley Review, a semiannual online literary journal, was founded in 2005 by its current editor, Leah Browning.  It is published in the spring and fall of the year.  Each issue features a collection of poetry, short fiction, and personal essays.

--


I outfitted my spy as an applepicker and sent him off deep in the virtual hills to speak with 
editor Leah Browning at Apple Valley Review headquarters. The transcript follows.

1) I always recommend that potential submitters read their most recent couple issues of a journal before submitting there (at least the genre which they're submitting), but if you could recommend, say three or so pieces (or however many) that you feel especially exemplify for one reason or another, what you're looking for, or that you are especially proud to have published and think everyone, whether they plan on submitting or not, should read? 
TL;DR Pieces that exemplify the journal. 

This is really difficult to narrow down! I’m going to recommend a few pieces that stick in my mind for one reason or another, but there are many, many others besides these. 

Before Rehab,” a memoir excerpt by Tove Ditlevsen, was translated from the original Danish by Michael Goldman (Fall 2018). This segment is from Dependency, the third book in an autobiographical trilogy by Ditlevsen. (The trilogy is currently scheduled for release by Farrar, Straus and Giroux in the United States in 2021.) The piece is very intimate, almost uncomfortably so, yet it speaks to the experiences of many other people. 

I typically prefer standalone pieces, not excerpts from longer work, so Tove Ditlevsen’s segment is not representative in that sense, but it does have an immediacy that I like. I am also particularly interested in translations.   

I’ve published a handful of pieces by Robert Radin over the years. “Noche Triste,” an essay (Spring 2018), and “Waiting on Celebrities,” a short story (Fall 2013), are my two personal favorites. He has a very strong and distinctive writing style.  

The Spring 2009 issue, for whatever reason, happened to contain several pieces of fiction that I have never forgotten. Those include stories by Matthew Grice (“Family Style”), Tai Dong Huai (“Backwards”), and—in an example of the way that, despite these issues having no particular theme, every issue contains surprising overlaps in content—Arrie Brown (“Goose Eggs”) and Jozefina Cutura (“The Egg Thief”).  

This issue also showcases many things I like in fiction: traditional and slightly more conceptual forms, flash fiction and fuller short stories, domestic and international writing, and variety in general.

We publish more poems than anything else in the journal, so these are even more difficult to choose. There are a lot of different lengths, styles, and topics that I find myself drawn to, so much so that I can’t think of anything that is truly representative of the whole. I’m going to single out two poems by Vince Corvaia: “Love and Reading” (Spring 2010) and “Optometrist” (Fall 2008). They are both short and, to my mind, perfect. Again, though, there are so many more selections that I’d like to highlight, both in poetry and prose—but I’ve obviously gone well over three here. 

Early on, I said that one of the reasons I choose to publish something is because I read it and immediately want to give it to someone else to read. The journal is my way of sharing those pieces.

2) Is there any genre, topic, theme or stylistic that you are surprised you don't see more of, or that you would like to see more of? For instance prose poems, stories about organized sports (or one in particular), non-conventional family narratives, non-standard typography, alternate history, high sci-fi, hybrid pieces utilizing white space... 
TL;DR I wouldn't kick these submissions out of bed for eating crackers. (updateable, if the interview results in an unwanted flux of submissions)
I’m often looking for nonfiction prose (personal essays, creative nonfiction, memoir). This is a terrifically difficult form, I think. 

Personally, I have a strong interest in translated work. Though the majority of what is published in the journal is original work in English, I am always open to translations, especially from writers who don’t already have a following in the United States and from languages that are less frequently translated into English. I would like to see even more work by contemporary writers that has been translated into English (with the author’s permission, of course). 

Although I tend not to read strict genre fiction, I often like writing with genre elements (i.e., fabulism, magical realism). It doesn’t always sing to me, but in a general sense, I do like to read surrealist writing. 

3) Hard sells—and not just the standard (though very important) "don't send hateful, misogynist, racist etc" work. Is there a plot, trope, character, motif, idiom or even phrase you would like people to think twice about before using? One that you see a ton, or that stick out when you're reading, in a negative way for whatever reason.
TL;DR Hard sells.
I do not like violence. That is the first thing that comes to mind. However, I also do sometimes read (and publish) work that has some violence in it, so there are exceptions. Anything really graphic, though, is probably a hard sell. 

In everyday life, I’m not opposed to swearing, but I prefer not to publish anything that is too blue. I’m always mindful that this is an online journal with no paywall or other restrictions, and it is widely available all over the world. I’ve gotten letters and messages about the journal from people of all ages. It is intended for adults, so of course there is going to be content that may not be appropriate for your six-year-old, but it does tend to be on the cleaner side. 

Also rhyming poetry. There are exceptions here, too—in the past couple of years, for example, an issue included sonnets—but I tend to prefer free verse. That’s just a personal preference. 


4) If you could pick 2-3 pieces of writing that you just love that are already out in the world and somehow have the ability to have discovered it in your slushpile, itching for you to publish them, what would they be? 
TL;DR Wish I could've published that!

Oh, wow. This is another question with a million answers. I apologize in advance for going over three again. 

Here are a few short stories and poems that just knocked me out:  

Adrift,” a piece of personal history by Dianne Belfrey (The New Yorker, November 7, 2016): 
He pulled off the tarp to reveal a beautiful wooden sailboat. I said he must be a sailor, and he replied that, no, he’d never been on a boat before he’d made this one, adding that he’d found a book at a stoop sale which had instructions for how to build a model boat, and thought that it would be fun to try to build a full-sized boat using it as a guide. I didn’t especially care about boats, or about sailing, but I did like stories such as this one. When I asked him whether it worked, he laughed and looked down and said that he supposed it did, as he’d sailed it on the Hudson. I blame everything on the boat. If it hadn’t been there, none of the rest would have happened. I wouldn’t have left my husband and run away with the man—I’ll call him William—who had built it.  

Withdrawals,” a piece of flash fiction by Brian Crawford (Vestal Review, January 2020): 
A month later, someone started making small withdrawals from his account, from ATMs up and down Nevada. The amounts were not material, and anyway it was his own money. His wife had insisted they each keep separate financial lives. “You never know what’ll happen,” she’d said, “and I always want to be able to make it on my own.” 

Halflife,” a poem by Meghan O’Rourke (Poetry, September 2005):
The blue square of light
in the window across the street
never goes dark—

When in the Dordogne,” a short story by Lily King (One Story, October 26, 2015): 
The summer of 1986, the summer I was fourteen, my parents went to the Dordogne for eight weeks. My father had been unwell, and it was thought that France, where he had studied as a young man, would enable his recovery. Through the university’s employment office, my mother hired two sophomores to house-sit for the time they would be out of the country. As I came with the house, these two college boys were obliged to take care of me, too.

Indulgence,” a short story by Susan Perabo (One Story, May 3, 2013): 
My mother was thrilled to be dying of brain cancer after a lifetime of smoking. She had dodged the bullet of lung cancer after all, she triumphantly announced to me on the phone that summer afternoon. All those years my brothers and I had hassled her, lectured her, begged her, berated her (“Don’t you want to see your grandchildren graduate from college?”)—and for what? Her lungs were fine!

The Poltroon Husband,” a short story by Joseph O’Neill (The New Yorker, March 12, 2018): 
Our house, the very clever work of a local architect, consists of five shipping containers raised several feet above the ground. Half of one container functions as a garden office and the other half functions as a covered footbridge over the stream that runs through our land; previously, you had to negotiate a pair of old planks. 

Rosendale,” a short story by Paul La Farge (The New Yorker, September 29, 2014): 
She also has an extensive library of self-help books, which implies that, for all her intelligence and self-possession, Dara may have some problems. She is for sure a recovering alcoholic; one of the first things she told April P was that she doesn’t allow drinking or drugs in her house. Also, and she did not warn April P about this, Dara is a toucher. She keeps finding reasons to squeeze April P’s arm, pat her hand, give her a mini shoulder rub.  

The Cameras,” a short story by Jennifer Kronovet (Bennington Review): 
My husband had warned me about the cameras before we moved to Guangzhou, saying that there would or wouldn’t be video cameras hidden all over our apartment and that someone in the Chinese government would or wouldn’t be watching us at all times. He told me that there was no point in having a password on my computer because the cameras would see what was on my computer screen. That’s how good the cameras that did or did not exist were.

This was after I rolled the windows down, hoping rushing wind would rid my clothes of his cologne. This was after I slid into my car, having barely opened the door, as if I were afraid his neighbors would spot me.

Cosmopolitan,” a short story by Akhil Sharma (The Atlantic, January 1997): 
Mrs. Shaw rang the bell again. Gopal woke confused and anxious, the state he was in most mornings. He was wearing only underwear and socks, but his blanket was cold from sweat.

Service Station,” a poem by Danusha Laméris (Tin House, March 21, 2018): 
You’re beautiful, sister, eat more fruit,
said the attendant every time my mother 
pulled into the 76 off Ashby Avenue.

5) To your tastes, how would you describe the sort of "experimental" writing you seek? The idea of categorizing experimental or avant-garde writing is very slippery, as it means different things to different people, and it can even change over time from the same person's perspective. So in this moment, allowing that tomorrow you may feel differently and we won't hold you to it, what are you looking for in experimental writing? Is there a 'soft line' where it begins to lose meaning or goes too far (say, where you think the author/artist's intentions are subverted or hurt by the radical level of experimentation—of course allowing exceptions, we're not issuing challenges here), or perhaps a 1-10 scale with 10 fully embracing the avant-garde and 1 wanting no part of it at all. 
TL;DR The journal's place on the spectrum of 'experimental'.
In terms of form, I think I tend more toward the traditional. That said, though, I sometimes like unusual constructions or at least slightly blurred lines (as with, for example, prose poems or more poetic personal essays). It’s difficult to say what I look for in experimentation, since I think of experimental writing as something unusual or new, so it would be something I haven’t seen before. 

There is definitely a line where experimentation can go too far, though, at least for me. If the form of the story is so creative and different that I can’t understand or follow it, then even if I might appreciate what the writer was trying to do, it might not really work for me as a story. I’d say I’m probably a six on your scale.  
6) If you could speak directly to a potential submitter as a voice in their head, like their 'submission conscience', neither angel nor devil but bookish nerd that wants the person to have the best chance with their submission as possible, what would you want them to be sure to do or consider when submitting? 
TL;DR Please consider this when submitting.
Just do your best to follow the guidelines. I keep word counts slightly flexible on purpose. If I say I’ll read stories up to 4,000 words, and you've got your story exactly where you want it at 4,005 words, I don’t want you to shave off five of them to fit what is in reality a pretty arbitrary number. I like to see what people want to show me. 

That said, this is an online journal, and I typically publish shorter pieces. They are easier to read in an online format. Please don’t send me novels or other book manuscripts, a 10,000-word story, a series of twenty epic poems, or anything that goes too far beyond the bounds of what the guidelines suggest.  

Obviously, as with any journal, if you are simultaneously submitting, and one of your pieces gets accepted elsewhere, please withdraw it as soon as possible. 

Other than that, as long as it fits the guidelines, go ahead and try; I’m open to a lot of different topics and forms of writing. It may already be apparent here, but I appreciate both a “less is more” and a “more is more” aesthetic, in a lot of different ways. 

For less experienced writers, I just want to add that rejection is unfortunately a big part of the submission process, both for writers and for editors. I don’t like turning down work, but the fact is that I read hundreds of submissions for every one that I accept. If you submit to the Apple Valley Review, and your piece isn’t accepted, but you have another that you think might be a good fit, please feel free to try us again. You’re not bothering me! I like to read. 


--

At this point our spy realized that Leah Browning had slowly been walking backwards during their conversation and as she finished her final answer, expertly timed and in stride, she stepped inside her door and slammed it on our spy's face. I have done it, it's a spy after all, and in all honesty Leah Browning was a gracious host. But not every journal will be quite so accommodating—because of that we'll keep reporting back from the various assignments of our Spy in the Slushpile.

2020 Writing Exercise Series #339: Title Mania Plus 53

      


The Notebooking Daily 2020 Writing Series is here! These are daily writing exercises for both prose writers and poets to keep your creative mind stretched and ready to go—fresh for your other writing endeavors. The writing prompts take the impetus—that initial crystal of creation—out of your hands (for the most part) and changes your writing creation into creative problem solving. Instead of being preoccupied with the question "What do I write" you are instead pondering "How do I make this work?" And in the process you are producing new writing.

These exercises are not meant to be a standard writing session. They are meant to be productive and to keep your brain thinking about using language to solve simple or complex problems. The worst thing you can do is sit there inactive. It's like taking a 5 minute breather in the middle of a spin class—the point is to push, to produce something, however imperfect. If you don't overthink them, you will be able to complete all of the exercises in under 30 minutes.

#339
Title Mania Plus 53

For today's writing exercise you will write a piece of poetry or prose which uses one of the following as its title. Before you write, first read the poem from which the titles are selected. For a bonus challenge use the additional exercise of five random constraints.

Today's titles come from the awesome poem "Molting Pastoral" by Chase Ferree published in Juke Joint's November issue. Go read it first!


Titles:
  1. The Tears Were Unintended
  2. A Trout's Back
  3. A Slash of Sun
  4. Downstream
  5. A Bus Ride to Wherever
  6. Commingled

Bonus Exercise: Three Things
(Your piece must also include the following three 'things')
  1. A Lamb
  2. The Tide
  3. An Omelet
------------------------------------

If you'd like some background music to write to, try this "Just to Make you Smile" lofi mix, again from our lofi buddy Dreamy.

12/10/20

2020 Writing Exercise Series #338 They said that Anaphora—Repetition Files 16

   


The Notebooking Daily 2020 Writing Series is a daily writing exercises for both prose writers and poets to keep your creative mind stretched and ready to go—fresh for your other writing endeavors. The writing prompts take the impetus—that initial crystal of creation—out of your hands (for the most part) and changes your writing creation into creative problem solving. Instead of being preoccupied with the question "What do I write" you are instead pondering "How do I make this work?" And in the process you are producing new writing.


These exercises are not meant to be a standard writing session. They are meant to be productive and to keep your brain thinking about using language to solve simple or complex problems. The worst thing you can do is sit there inactive. It's like taking a 5 minute breather in the middle of a spin class—the point is to push, to produce something, however imperfect. If you don't overthink them, you will be able to complete all of the exercises in under 30 minutes.

#338
They said that Anaphora—Repetition Files 16

For today's writing exercise you will write a piece of poetry or prose which focuses on repetition. In this instance we will work with anaphora. It's a handy little bit of poetic craft that goes a little something like this:

the repetition of a word or words at the beginning of successive phrases, clauses, or lines to create a sonic effect.
Take a moment and read the above-linked Poetry Foundation article, even if you know the term. For even more fun check out this longer article called Adventures in Anaphora.

Your mission is to use the following phrase to begin at least 5 sentences.

The word or phrase we'll use for our exercise today is:

"___ said that..." (name changing)

    There are a number of ways you could approach this bit of anaphora—who is recalling the event/multiple accounts? What is being discussed? Is it current? Are they humans talking even? Just be sure that the repeated phrase earns its worth in your piece, and it should in some way build upon what came before it. The repetition should be necessary and not merely redundant.

    Bonus Exercise: Include these five words into your piece "Roped" "Glittering" "Split" "Virus" and "Jolt".
    ------------------------------------

    If you'd like some background music to write to, try this "Last Days of the Year" Christmas lofi mix from our lofi buddy, the ever-busy Dreamy

    12/9/20

    2020 Writing Exercise Series #337: Erasing Roger Ebert 16 "Romancing the Stone"

       

    The Notebooking Daily 2020 Writing Series is a daily writing exercises for both prose writers and poets to keep your creative mind stretched and ready to go—fresh for your other writing endeavors. The writing prompts take the impetus—that initial crystal of creation—out of your hands (for the most part) and changes your writing creation into creative problem solving. Instead of being preoccupied with the question "What do I write" you are instead pondering "How do I make this work?" And in the process you are producing new writing.

    These exercises are not meant to be a standard writing session. They are meant to be productive and to keep your brain thinking about using language to solve simple or complex problems. The worst thing you can do is sit there inactive. It's like taking a 5 minute breather in the middle of a spin class—the point is to push, to produce something, however imperfect. If you don't overthink them, you will be able to complete all of the exercises in under 30 minutes.

    #337
    Erasing Roger Ebert 16 "Romancing the Stone"

    For today's exercise we have split paths for fiction and poetry, though I highly recommend that even fiction writers try the poetry exercise, because erasures can be a blast!

    For poetry do an erasure or black-out poem from the following:  Roger Ebert's review of the 1984 film "Romancing the Stone" (3 stars).

    Roger Ebert has been the stereotypical film critic for decades, and he's written thousands of reviews. Because of their nature, almost their own bit of ekphrastic art, this series of erasures will be lots of fun!

    An Erasure/Blackout is really simple: you take the given text and remove many words to make it your own new piece. One way to go about the erasure that I like to do is to copy the text and paste it twice into your document before you start erasing or blacking out (in MS Word set the text background color to black), that way if you get further into the erasure and decide you want a somewhat different tone or direction, it's easy to go to the unaltered version and make the erasure/black-out piece smoother. Another tip is to look for recurring words, in this example 'bingo' occurs multiple times and could be a good touchstone for your piece.

    If you insist on fiction (or just feel like writing a "Title Mania" piece), write a piece with one of these  titles taken from this section:

    1. From the Canyons of Manhattan to the Steaming Jungles of South America
    2. Lovers Devour Each Other
    3. The Same Spirit
    4. A Guy Named Jack
    5. Her Other Treasures
    6. Leftover Sexism


    Erasure Selection:

    Roger Ebert's review of "Romancing the Stone"

    It may have an awkward title, but "Romancing the Stone" is a silly, high-spirited chase picture that takes us, as they say, from the canyons of Manhattan to the steaming jungles of South America. The movie's about a New York woman who writes romantic thrillers in which the hungry lips of lovers devour each other as the sun sinks over the dead bodies of their enemies. Then she gets involved in a real-life thriller, which is filled with cliff-hanging predicaments just like the ones she writes about. The writer, played by Kathleen Turner, uses her novels as a form of escape. Throbbing loins may melt together on her pages, but not in her life. Then she gets a desperate message from her sister in South America: Unless she flies to Cartagena with a treasure map showing the location of a priceless green jewel, her sister will be killed.

    What follows is an adventure that will remind a lot of people of "Raiders of the Lost Ark," but it will be a pleasant memory. After all the "Raiders" rip-offs, it's fun to find an adventure film that deserves the comparison, that has the same spirit and sense of humor. Turner lands in Colombia, and almost instantly becomes part of the plans of a whole lineup of desperadoes. There are the local police, the local thugs, the local mountain bandits, and the local hero, a guy named Jack Colton, who is played by Michael Douglas.

    Movies like this work best if they have original inspirations about the ways in which the heroes can die. I rather liked the pit full of snarling alligators, for example. They also work well if the villains are colorful, desperate, and easy to tell apart. They are. Danny DeVito, from TV's 'Taxi' plays a Peter Lorre type, complete with a white tropical suit and a hat that keeps getting trampled in the mud. He's a gangster from up north, determined to follow Turner to the jewel.

    There's also a suave local paramilitary hero named Zolo (Manuel Ojeda), who wears a French Foreign Legion cap and lusts after not only Turner's treasure map but all of her other treasures. And Alfonso Arau plays a rural bandito who turns out to have memorized all of Turner's thrillers.

    Movies like this have a tendency to turn into a long series of scenes where the man grabs the woman by the hand and leads her away from danger at a desperate run. I always hate scenes like that. Why can't the woman run by herself? Don't they both have a better chance if the guy doesn't have to always be dragging her? What we're really seeing is leftover sexism from the days when women were portrayed as hapless victims. "Romancing the Stone" doesn't have too many scenes like that. It begins by being entirely about the woman, and although Douglas takes charge after they meet, that's basically because he knows the local territory. Their relationship is on an equal footing, and so is their love affair. We get the feeling they really care about each other, and so the romance isn't just a distraction from the action.


    ------------------------------------

    If you'd like some background music to write to, try this "Guitar Vibe" lofi mix.



    12/8/20

    2020 Writing Exercise Series #336: 3x5x7 Wordbank Sprints 45

            


    The Notebooking Daily 2020 Writing Series is a daily writing exercises for both prose writers and poets to keep your creative mind stretched and ready to go—fresh for your other writing endeavors. The writing prompts take the impetus—that initial crystal of creation—out of your hands (for the most part) and changes your writing creation into creative problem solving. Instead of being preoccupied with the question "What do I write" you are instead pondering "How do I make this work?" And in the process you are producing new writing.

    These exercises are not meant to be a standard writing session. They are meant to be productive and to keep your brain thinking about using language to solve simple or complex problems. The worst thing you can do is sit there inactive. It's like taking a 5 minute breather in the middle of a spin class—the point is to push, to produce something, however imperfect. If you don't overthink them, you will be able to complete all of the exercises in under 30 minutes.
    #336
    3x5x7 Wordbank Sprints 45
    For today's writing exercise complete the following steps. The wordbank exercise has changed so be sure to take a peek at the new 'rules'. I recommend using the timer on your phone or computer and setting it for 1 minute. Each time you write a sentence, quickly reset the timer. If it goes off before you're finished with the sentence—wrap it up ASAP!

    In order to complete the large number of sentences demanded of this exercise it is imperative that you write fast. Don't think too much at all until you've reached the final exercise. The process of this quick production is to thrust past second guesses or other stumbling blocks that sometimes impede your writing. You're aiming to write 23 sentences in at most 20 minutes so you have ten minutes to organize and write that actual piece, so you're going to be writing more than a sentence a minute.

    WRITE FAST, DON'T OVERTHINK


    1. Pick one word from each of three groups and write a sentence that includes all of the words, feel free to change tense, pluralize, gerund etc. Repeat the process five (5) times using different combinations. No dawdling! 
    2. Now write three (3) sentences that are six (6) words or fewer in length that use any two (2) words from the wordbanks.
    3. Now write three (3) sentences that use four (4) or more of the words.
    4. Now write five (5) sentences which begin with one (1) of the words and contain a second one (1) of the words.
    5. Now write five (5) sentences which are fewer than ten (10) words in length and conclude with one (1) of the words from the wordbanks. Remember, keep up the pace! Don't overthink!
    6. Now rephrase two (2) of your sentences from exercise #1 in either a more efficient or more descriptive manner.
    7. Now write a piece of fiction or poetry that uses at least three (3) of the sentences you've written throughout this process of exercises. Try to use as many of the (good) sentences as you can, or parts of the sentences if the whole thing doesn't fit or works better altered.
    Word Bank 1:
    • Elevated
    • Low-key
    • Epicenter
    • Granular
    • Gulag
    Wordbank 2:
    • Slap
    • Chew
    • Pew
    • Quelch
    • Trollop
    Wordbank 3:
    • Drapes
    • Lime
    • Olympics
    • Wasp
    • Basil

    Bonus writing exercise: Include the word "Frog" in your title or opening sentence, and in the piece you must include at least one event that happened at least 20 years beforehand.

    ------------------------------------

    Want some unobtrusive background writing music? Try this "Magic dusk" lofi mix. 

    12/7/20

    2020 Writing Exercise Series #335: Three Things Together 57

      


    The Notebooking Daily 2020 Writing Series is a daily writing exercises for both prose writers and poets to keep your creative mind stretched and ready to go—fresh for your other writing endeavors. The writing prompts take the impetus—that initial crystal of creation—out of your hands (for the most part) and changes your writing creation into creative problem solving. Instead of being preoccupied with the question "What do I write" you are instead pondering "How do I make this work?" And in the process you are producing new writing.


    These exercises are not meant to be a standard writing session. They are meant to be productive and to keep your brain thinking about using language to solve simple or complex problems. The worst thing you can do is sit there inactive. It's like taking a 5 minute breather in the middle of a spin class—the point is to push, to produce something, however imperfect. If you don't overthink them, you will be able to complete all of the exercises in under 30 minutes.

    #335
    Three Things Together 57

    F
    or today's writing exercise you will write a piece of poetry or prose which contains the following three things, Nice and simple.
    1. A Bail of Hay
    2. A Bathroom Scale
    3. Vienna
    ------------------------------------

    Bonus 'Five Words': Include these five words in your piece: Wheat, Gnats, Controlling, Fishing, Cow.

    If you'd like some background music to write to, try this "Cozy Christmas" lofi mix.

    12/5/20

    2020 Writing Exercise Series #334: Title Mania Plus 52

         


    The Notebooking Daily 2020 Writing Series is here! These are daily writing exercises for both prose writers and poets to keep your creative mind stretched and ready to go—fresh for your other writing endeavors. The writing prompts take the impetus—that initial crystal of creation—out of your hands (for the most part) and changes your writing creation into creative problem solving. Instead of being preoccupied with the question "What do I write" you are instead pondering "How do I make this work?" And in the process you are producing new writing.

    These exercises are not meant to be a standard writing session. They are meant to be productive and to keep your brain thinking about using language to solve simple or complex problems. The worst thing you can do is sit there inactive. It's like taking a 5 minute breather in the middle of a spin class—the point is to push, to produce something, however imperfect. If you don't overthink them, you will be able to complete all of the exercises in under 30 minutes.

    #334
    Title Mania Plus 52

    For today's writing exercise you will write a piece of poetry or prose which uses one of the following as its title. Before you write, first read the poem from which the titles are selected. For a bonus challenge use the additional exercise of five random constraints.

    Today's titles come from the awesome poem "Navigational Notes" by Hayden Saunier published in Thrush Poetry Journal's November issue. Go read it first!


    Titles:
    1. Pretending there is no Longing
    2. Mournful Cello
    3. The Names We Call Things
    4. The Ship
    5. Too Deep, Too Cold
    6. Bioluminescent Creatures

    Bonus Exercise: Three Things
    (Your piece must also include the following three 'things')
    1. A Large Cardboard Box
    2. Scissors
    3. A Coyote
    ------------------------------------

    If you'd like some background music to write to, try this "North Lights" lofi mix.

    Coastal Shelf Literary Magazine announces its 2021 reading schedule!

    Coastal Shelf has announced their 2021 reading schedule and it's jam-packed! Click here for their Submission Guidelines Page
    Click here for their Contest Page.

    They have open reading periods (free and tip jar) January 1-7, and May 15-31, 3 contests and a science themed reading window. Fun for the whole writing family!

    The FuPo Poetry Contest is for “funny and poignant” poems under 60 lines. 3/5/21 deadline. More here.
    The Ceiling 200 Contest is for very short fiction or prose poetry under 200 words long. 3/5/21 deadline. More here.
    Submission window: The FuPo PoCo and the Ceiling 200 Contests open on January 1st and have a March 5th deadline.
    Entry fees: 1 piece=no fee; up to 2 pieces=$5; up to 3 pieces=$15; up to 5 pieces=$25; up to 7 pieces=$35.
    Prizes: Each contest will have $250 first prize, $100 second prize and $50 third prize—and all of the pieces submitted will be considered for publication at the normal rate (this year that would be $30).

    The “In One Go” Folio Contest is for selections of work that are best read together, hence the name. We’re accepting prose, poetry and anything in between. For poetry submissions we’re looking for poetry roughly 6-14 poems (under 24 pages) and for prose 3-10 pieces of short fiction (under 1500 words each, totaling no more than 10k words). This folio will appear as a feature in issue #7, and also as an artistically designed standalone pdf.
    Entry fees: $10. Like Pay it Forward options, we’re offering a ‘donation’ option of an additional $10 which will go entirely to the author on top of the prize and in the note introducing the prize winners the ‘patrons’ will get a thank you.
    Prize: $200 prize. All pieces submitted will be considered for publication at the normal rate (this year that would be $30 for an individual piece or $100 for a feature). And this is just an estimate—if we have a busy enough ‘Pay it Forward’ submission season before the contest kicks off, the prize may be doubled even—we’ll have an updated total before we start reading.

    12/4/20

    2020 Writing Exercise Series #333: Beginning & Ending with Percussion 36

     


    The Notebooking Daily 2020 Writing Series is a daily writing exercises for both prose writers and poets to keep your creative mind stretched and ready to go—fresh for your other writing endeavors. The writing prompts take the impetus—that initial crystal of creation—out of your hands (for the most part) and changes your writing creation into creative problem solving. Instead of being preoccupied with the question "What do I write" you are instead pondering "How do I make this work?" And in the process you are producing new writing.

    These exercises are not meant to be a standard writing session. They are meant to be productive and to keep your brain thinking about using language to solve simple or complex problems. The worst thing you can do is sit there inactive. It's like taking a 5 minute breather in the middle of a spin class—the point is to push, to produce something, however imperfect. If you don't overthink them, you will be able to complete all of the exercises in under 30 minutes.

    #333
    Beginning & Ending with Percussion 36


    F
    or today's writing exercise you will write a piece of poetry or prose which begins with one image, scenario, line of dialog or place and ends with another, and an optional additional requirement.


    Begin WithSomeone pounding on a door.

    End WithSomeone playing a tambourine.

    Extra Credit RequirementsInclude, somewhere in the first two paragraphs/stanzas, the phrase "Without enough"; and somewhere in your piece include the words: "Jokes" "Dip" "Flag" "Crackled" and "Looming".

    ------------------------------------

    If you'd like some unobtrusive background music try this "Above the Clouds" lofi playlist from our friend Dreamy.

    12/3/20

    2020 Writing Exercise Series #332: Six Word Shootout 37

            


    The Notebooking Daily 2020 Writing Series is a daily writing exercises for both prose writers and poets to keep your creative mind stretched and ready to go—fresh for your other writing endeavors. The writing prompts take the impetus—that initial crystal of creation—out of your hands (for the most part) and changes your writing creation into creative problem solving. Instead of being preoccupied with the question "What do I write" you are instead pondering "How do I make this work?" And in the process you are producing new writing.

    These exercises are not meant to be a standard writing session. They are meant to be productive and to keep your brain thinking about using language to solve simple or complex problems. The worst thing you can do is sit there inactive. It's like taking a 5 minute breather in the middle of a spin class—the point is to push, to produce something, however imperfect. If you don't overthink them, you will be able to complete all of the exercises in under 30 minutes.

    #332
    Six Word Shootout 37

    For today's writing exercise write a piece that includes the following six words. While it perfectly sets you up for a sestina, and while I am a sucker for homonyms, feel free to write whatever you'd like (but ya know, maybe give that sestina a shot!). Also feel free to make slight alterations to the required words if you want to avoid that eye-pokey repetition you can find in sestinas sometimes.

    Required Words: 

    1) Run
    2) Elbow
    3) White
    4) Because
    5) Silver
    6) Pour

    -
    Bonus Exercise: Include the following three things: A Slingshot, Antacid and The Nile River.
    ------------------------------------

    If you'd like some background music to write to, try this "Trip into Space" lofi mix.